I have been trying to "eat along" with The Ravishing Mrs. TB as she is embarking on her dietary adventure (modified keto). On the whole, this means a great many vegetables and proteins and not much else. For me, more protein for training (trying to keep at that 1 g/ 1 lb ratio), but otherwise I am trying adhere in principle to what she is trying to accomplish. And it is certainly no great sacrifice: we still get plenty of protein through meat or eggs (and steak. We are eating more beef. This makes me happy.) and the vegetable servings are rather large, prepared in different ways, and (sometimes) surprisingly delicious.
As we have gone through this process, I have been shocked to realize a great many things about my own food choices.
I liked to think I was (overall) fairly thoughtful and measured in my food choices, that I overall ate healthy. Yes, I had a few issues - I do like my desserts! - but I thought I was doing pretty well.
Guess what? Not quite so much. To paraphrase a relatively "modern" pop song (at least for me), "I like empty carbs and I cannot lie".
By thinking more actively about what I am eating, I find that I am also thinking a lot more when I do not eat about what I would be eating. And generally - outside of regularly meals - my input looks a great deal like carbs - generally empty, and a lot of them.
I am a food texture sort of fellow. I like things that crunch in my mouth, and I like salt - so anything that looks like a pretzel, cracker, or that it might be remotely crunchy is something that is in danger of being eaten. Which is okay of course - in moderation, anything can be fine. Unfortunately, moderation is not a thing I am always particularly good at.
And so, I try to find better alternatives for crunch or not eat them at all.
It is certainly not like I am suffering - there are more than enough other things I can (and do) eat and eat with gusto (if a word like "gusto" can be applied to something like celery). And it has made me more conscious overall of how I am eating, never a bad thing when diabetes lurks in the background of one's genetics like a minor theme in a bad horror movie, always ready to leap out with a cheap scare.
Eating well, as they say, is no more difficult than eating poorly: one just has to make conscious choices and pay attention. What is fascinating to me - and depressing at the same time - is how hard commercialism and society works to ensure that making such choices is difficult.
One of the keys, as it turns out, to this process is simply that eating this way looks a lot like simple cooking. The recipes made are not terribly elaborate: a protein, perhaps a sauce, and a vegetable suitably roasted/broiled/slightly seared. But they take time - all of The Ravishing Mrs. TB's meal prep now takes more time, chopping and slicing and packaging up. Convenience as it comes in a box or bag or prepared by someone is much quicker.
Along with simplicity in recipes, our grocery list has gotten a great deal simpler: protein, vegetables, fruit (for me, not her right now), and some dairy. That is largely it. I eat protein bars and whey for training, but not much more processed food than that.
So it becomes - from a commercial point of view - a losing proposition for everyone except the grocery stores: much less products purchased and minimal processed foods purchased, and virtually no restaurants or delivery services engaged.
(Yes, I know many of live like this normally and have for years. Please be patient with me, I am slow in any number of ways).
So the paradox is that a diet that is better for us is not necessarily "better" for modern society - to those that decry modern agriculture and modern food processing in terms of a "better world", all sorts of financial implications from this occur: less employment in these industries, less taxes collected from these industries, less people employed packaging and transporting and cooking and serving and delivering food with the implications that their unemployment, purchasing, and tax collection brings.
All this from simply eating better and different. It makes me wonder - for the thousandth time, perhaps - that we have not trained ourselves in critical thought in the way we should.
Would more natural eating be better for any number of reasons? Of course; obesity is a growing trend in the US and modern agricultural practices (my mind says practiced by corporate agriculture, but it could be by anyone) can be destructive and wreak long term impacts on the land we need to grow the food. Yet all these implications - financial capital, human capital - flow from it. Those are never addressed at all.
Which, to be frank with you, is probably a lot more than I need to be thinking about the subject. I am just working to be more thoughtful about my food and when and why I eat.
And, of course, working hard to make the peanut butter fit elegantly into curve of my celery to make it more palatable than struggling to smear it just on the side.
Be careful of that peanut butter, it could give you more of the iron in your diet if it's the Skippy brand (recent recall on that product)....:) It takes dedication and resolve to bring about diet change, something I hold for about two months and then backslide, O you evil cookies/donuts!
ReplyDeleteNylon12 - Right now it is our local grocery store "house" brand, which inevitably is cheaper than the national brands. I like to move to something with less sugar, but use up what we have first of course...
DeleteI have about the same level of success. I am hopeful that for myself, the change this time will be driven by the fact that I am effectively supporting my wife and (with her change in diet) there will simply be less of those foods in reach. Fortunately post-Plague I almost never socialize, so the risk of "social eating" is greatly reduced.
"food texture" is very important.
ReplyDelete7 people in my family growing up and my mother often worked outside of the home. When she made vegetables EVERYTHING WAS FREAKING BOILED !!!!
BLAH !!!!!
But if I have then either steamed or fresh now, I love vegetables !!!
We joined a food service several moths ago (Hello Fresh) it costs a little more that doing the shopping ourselves but every meal has the exact ingredients needed, the recipes are easy and simple and for me, it's portion control.
Matthew, you and I had the same experience: most everything we had was boiled as well, at least growing up (there is nothing quite as depressing as boiled spinach). I suspect she did not have other experience. Now, as you do, we have everything steamed, roasted or fresh.
DeleteWe have used Hello Fresh as well (due to the change in diet plans, we have put a pause on it). Almost every recipe we had from them was great! Not doing the shopping was convenient, although it did mean we kept less ready meals in the house, which was an issue when we "ran out" of pre-planned meals.
I too have been "supporting" my Bride in better eating and it sounds as if her regimen is very similar to the one of the Ravishing Mrs. TB. Scale's moving in the right direction, albeit slowly.
ReplyDeleteRef peanut butter; pre WuFlu we were able to buy fresh-ground (from peanuts, nothing else) not only at whole foods but at one of our local chains. This has always been my preference. I used to buy "Deaf Smith" brand in jars, Smuckers had a "pure peanut butter in jars as well that I used to buy. With either of these, stirring the oil back into the rest was a messy task. I learned to store those jars upside down.
Since WuFlu I have taken to making my own peanut butter in a food processor. One can of roasted Spanish peanuts produces a one-pint jar of peanut butter. The only addition is a tiny bit of oil for consistency's sake, something learned by trial and error.
Boat Guy
Boat Guy - Same experience here as well, although we are somewhat earlier in the process than it sounds like you are.
DeleteYour experience with peanut butter sounds similar to the one I remember from my material grandparents' house (probably because it was fresh ground as well); I do remember the oil. Thank you for the peanut butter recipe; I am interested to try eat (and eat enough peanut butter to justify the experiment.
Bride now prefers my peanut butter to all others. Quite a compliment.
DeleteBG
That is awesome Boat Guy. Here, the family would rather take my home made yogurt than store bought. It is indeed quite a compliment.
DeleteAfter the head injury, I lived on scrambled eggs for weeks. I couldn't stand for long, and no one was there to help. I guess that took. I like a good greasy breakfast. Eggs, bacon, toast and apple butter. Pancakes on occasion. Lunch is usually light, and supper is a snack (pint of milk, some cocoa powder and a banana or two run thru the blender=smoothie). I haven't really even thought much about meals in almost two years. I've lost about 25 lbs.
ReplyDeleteMy chest and shoulders didn't fill out until I was in my mid twenties so the weight I was at the end of high scruel isn't a goal. I figure if I wound up around 200, it would fit my frame reasonably well. My knees, hips and ankles like the lower weight.
Keto in the past helped me. But just eating less and being more interested in doing things than sitting and eating has been the fix for me. I don't usually eat unless my stomach is growling.
Oh man !!!!
DeleteApple butter on pancakes !!!!
STxAR - Given my choice, I would probably eat as you suggest: A large breakfast (mine almost seven days a week is a half cup of oatmeal, a cup of yogurt, and a scoop of whey, with eggs thrown in sometimes), a smaller lunch (mine is typically a bowl of spinach, an apple, and some kind of protein), and an even lighter dinner (the diet practice has helped as well). I am about 35 lbs above what I graduated with in high school. I would like to drop 10 lbs or so, but it is slow going as I want to lose the fat and keep the muscle - and yes, doing it for knees and feet as well.
DeleteI know many people in the throwing community that swear by keto - but ultimately, you are right. It comes down to making a change; a diet can help that.
For me, the easiest way to control a diet is to just not have it in the house. I may get cravings when I am at home but my lazy side outweighs the cravings by declining to get in the car and drive all the way to the grocery store just to scratch that itch. That is one advantage I can see to being lazy.
ReplyDeleteAs for your larger theme, I think the only real option for eating healthy without breaking the bank is to live someplace where the diet you need is all around. I'm thinking of somewhere in the Mediterranean or the coast of Japan. For those of us in the middle of a country with no real access to fresh produce or seafoods that aren't shipped and thus more expensive, one has to diet with their wallet. The poor among us aren't able to do this unfortunately.
Another interesting post from TB. I can relate to everything you say, although I ponder it with a slightly different goal, i.e. homestead food self-sufficiency. (A goal with which we are only partially successful.)
ReplyDeleteWhat I've observed is that if we ate only what we can produce ourselves, then our diet would be primarily vegetables and proteins (milk, cheese, eggs, meat, dried beans), then fruit and butter, lastly grain carbohydrates because these are the most labor intensive to to grow, harvest, and process. Vegetable carbs are a little easier (potatoes and corn), but would still be less plentiful than other vegetables and proteins. So, for us, a natural diet would be very similar to your modified keto diet.
I think a local homegrown diet (either from one's own garden or a farmer's market) is definitely a healthier diet for people, and also for the environment, because we cut out all the packaging, processing, and transportation miles.
Leigh - Were I to do as i would like, I think my diet would look largely like what you describe - although dried beans remain a challenge, Black eyed peas fill the gap. Sweet potatoes, at least here now, are remarkably productive and I suspect I could grow an entire year's worth with enough effort.
DeleteFrankly, I suspect any diet which involves a great deal less process food is healthier. And definitely has all of the environmental benefits you list. But as it interferes with a lot of people making money, I suspect it will never be truly "endorsed", just talked about as vaguely a good idea.
I am old enough to remember several diet changes. Airforce diet, Atkins, etc. If you don't like keto, just wait a couple of years until someone comes up with the next miracle way to eat. Common sense and moderation works for me.
ReplyDelete"Diets" will almost always fail for long term, because you have to stay on them to keep your medical condition stable.
DeleteRather, it needs to be a "lifestyle" one needs for long term success.
Tewshooz, I think the first diet I can "remember" is a very early version of Weight Watchers which my mother did.
DeleteDiets to me are a lot like sports: one has to keep trying them until one find something that works. I only did sports through eighth grace and did not pick them up again until my mid-forties until I found some (Highland Games and Iaijustu) that I actually enjoyed. Diets to me are the same: They connect with people in different ways and it just a matter of finding a diet that makes sense and is translatable to the person. Because ultimately, as you and Matthew point out, it has to become a lifestyle, and people tend to only keep lifestyles that work for them.
Yes, common sense and moderation IS the lifestyle. Choice of food is just one part of it.
DeleteAgreed Tewshooz. Actually works for a great many number of things.
DeleteI have the opposite problem TB. A wife who can't gain weight and needs to. She can eat sugary food with impunity. I simply have to go absolute cold turkey on that bin of cookies she has on the counter all the time. If I could limit my portion size, I'd do a lot better eating whatever she cooks, but that's not easy.
ReplyDeleteSome years ago, I got serious about doing a low carb diet. Like STxAR, I like a good greasy breakfast, and if it includes any toast, it's only one slice, and that is an excuse to slather on the butter. I used to describe my diet as somewhere between Adkins and Paleo. The true Keto diet is very good as a therapeutic regimen, but I think it is not only difficult to get a good balance in your diet, but not a good thing for long term nutrition.
The Keto principle is to get your metabolism off of the insulin-sugar roller coaster, and on to a fat burning metabolism. Once I did that, I found that hunger cravings were much diminished. I'd eat one large meal a day in the evening, and brunch was a protein shake. Good fats are the other part of the food triad, after protein and (low) complex carbs. Sugar and simple carbs are the enemy.
Good, grass finished beef (grass fed is a weasel term--all beef is grass fed until it's sent to the nightmare of a feedlot), well marbled with fat is wonderful. Since I can't always afford premium beef, I supplement my grocery store beef with fish oil or flax oil supplements to at least attempt to better balance the ratio of good fats.
Another good fat source I like, and certainly will do for the "crunch" factor is lots of nuts. I like to roast my own with coconut oil and salt.
I cannot let any discussion of nutrition go without plugging Gary Taubes. Without a doubt, his books are some of the most significant works I've ever read on the subject.
Greg, I have known people like that (were that my problem as well).
DeleteMy understanding of Keto is similar to yours: it is a good tool for certain things, but not necessarily a long term diet. The diet that has "connected" with me longer term is The Sonoma Diet, which is similar to the Mediterranean Diet; Protein, vegetables, some carbs, and good fats. I suppose that given my way, I would eat a somewhat modified version of that.
That said, essentially managing my carbs to a low level has not been as huge a challenge as I thought: oatmeal in the morning and an apple at lunch cover me, and in fact I find myself not very hungry at lunch (although I often still eat as if I was).
I do like beef when we get it, and we have been getting more of it. Fish (Salmon) is also a favorite.
Thank you for the recommendation of Gary Taubes. I will certainly look him up.
I am now in my eighth year of a totally plant based diet. It began as a WFPBD, but I've always struggled with the "whole food" part, eating more processed foods than I probably should. (you'd be surprised the things that are vegan...Oreos, for example... that cream filling is not dairy at all, but something unpronounceable and probably unhealthy) Still... it's been totally plant based the entire time and I don't find it difficult to maintain. (it would be easier if my husband also ate that way, but alas...)
ReplyDeleteLike you, I want a certain amount of texture and I'm all about the salty, savory things. (don't leave me alone with a bag of potato chips)
I've learned over the years that people have many different ideas about diet, nutrition, and what is best. I began my plant based journey for one reason, but have grown to think it's good for other reasons. I'll spare you by not getting long-winded with my opinions!
Kelly - A former friend and coworker is a long time vegetarian and made the observation that been vegetarian did not make you inherent healthier, just not eating meet (he used the example of Oreos as well). We have experimented with vegetarianism in the past and we usually have one or two meals that almost qualify.
DeleteAh, salt and crunch. What will they not cure?
I think most people come to a decision on diets and nutrition by a combination of thoughts, passing opinions and (for a lack of a better thought) just their own opinions. I have discussed the fact with omnivores that industrial meat production is an environmental nightmare. I have pointed out to vegans that industrial agriculture is often no better. I have pointed out to both that the bulk of their foods are transported, sometimes from far away, and they often rely on people whose diet they derided to plant, harvest, pick, sort, package, transport and sell the food.
What would ultimately make sense is people having the diets they desire but being supported by local agriculture instead of thousands of miles away agriculture. It would mean that some things would become regional items and other things special treats. It would, as Leigh points out above, spare us much of the processing, packaging, and transportation and the damage it causes. But it would also mean a complete configuration of urban living, which is not likely to happen.
I guess blogger ate my previous comment but it was something like the best way for me to just not buy junk food. My laziness to go to the grocery store to get junk food is larger than my ability to resist it once in the house. I just make sure to go to the store first thing in the morning when I’m full and not approaching the afternoon munchies.
ReplyDeleteApologies Ed - I did not see the comment either (Blogger does that to mine as well sometimes).
DeleteLike you, not having it in the house is the first line of defense - I will never go to the grocery store specifically for a non-required item. I do try to plan my snacks a bit more effectively so when shopping I already know what I am getting rather than ponder "What would I like?"
With prices now days, I wonder which proteins you are using for the diet?
ReplyDeleteI wish you both the best in your diet.
God bless you all, TB.
Linda, for years we have eaten a lot of chicken, almost to the point that I can easily get sick of it. Right now we are eating some chicken, some pork (tenderloin) and less expensive cuts of beef. More eggs of course. I think if the price of meat keeps rising, I may need to take up fishing!
DeleteThanks for your wishes. It will be an adjustment - these things always are - but I am confident everything will be better on the far side.
Boy, do I understand the texture and salt thing. They are my bugaboos. Chocolate, too, but it's easier somehow to forgo that longer than I can pass up crunchy stuffs. Or super savory foods. Mmmmmm
ReplyDeleteI'm realizing this post and the comments were a dangerous read for me at 11pm.
It was dangerous Becki! It is making me hungry reading it!
DeleteIf I had to give up sugar or salt, I think it would be salt. I do like desserts, but I like crunch salty foods better.