So what then is the Core of the Essentialist, the thing that Essentialists should be about?
McKeown starts with some basic mindset assumptions:
1) Individual choice: "We can choose how to spend our energy and our time."
2) The prevalence of noise: "Almost everything is noise, and a very few things are exceptionally valuable."
3) The reality of trade offs: "We can't have or do it all...Once we accept the reality of trade-offs, we stop asking 'How can I make it all work?' and start asking the more honest question 'Which problem do I want to solve?'"
How do we get to this point of decision? There is a simple, three step method that McKeown proposes.
1) Explore: Discerning the trivial many from the vital few
To do this, the Essentialist explores and evaluates many options before committing to any one of them. In fact, they explore more options than the Nonessentialist to make sure they make the right choice.
The Nonessentialist
Given the reality of tradeoffs, we cannot choose everything - but if we do not choose for ourselves, others will choose for us.
Years from now, suggests McKeown, we may have many regrets - but he believes Essentialism will not be one of them: "What would you trade then to be back here now for one chance - this chance - to be true to yourself? On that day, what will you hope you decided to do on this one?"
Or, as quoted before, "Tell me, what is it you plan to do/with your one wild and precious life?" (Mary Oliver)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome (and necessary, for good conversation). If you could take the time to be kind and not practice profanity, it would be appreciated. Thanks for posting!