Wednesday, March 13, 2019

On Not Preaching Holiness

The Western Church (by and large) has lost sight of the Holiness of God.

One of the great favors you can do yourself, if you are a Christian, is to work your way through Jaroslav Pelikan's 5 book study of the The Christian Tradition:  A History of the Development of Doctrine (I have only made it through Volume 4 but am re-reading the series this year).  In reading the books you find that the develop of the doctrine of the church was a bit longer drawn out that we like to believe ( the best known case of this of course, the Trinity, was not formally worked out until the 4th century).  You will also find that the Church, like any other human institution, goes through trends based on the society around it.

The trend in the Western Church - or at least the American Western Church - is justice.

Justice has become the defining nature of God.  Everything - society, history, current social mores, economy - is viewed through the lens of "The Justice of God" (and by justice, what is meant is equality and righting wrongs).  Thus, preaching of God's word becomes an exercise in 1) showing how the people of the Bible were unjust; 2)  showing how we currently are unjust; and 3) how we need to make fighting injustice our number one goal.

Now, there is a balance to be kept here.  The Bible is rather full of justice - and indeed, it talks about social justice as is suggested (Rights for the sojourner, widow and orphans, caring for the poor - check it, it's all there).  At the same time, the Bible is not ONLY about this thing.

We have lost the Holiness of God in this rush to justice.

God is holy - holy meaning not just as we think of it (really religious), but utterly pure and set apart from anything else.  He is the ultimate holder of gravitas, the one who is so beyond us in our sin in nature and in being that we wither away in His presence. 

God is also very, very explicit about the fact that He is holy - and that He expects us to be as well (Leviticus 11:44 is a fine example:  "Be ye holy, for I am Holy says the LORD").  It is as explicitly discussed as any other attribute of God (such as His love or justice, for example).  Yet holiness is something that you will scarcely hear preached on these days.

Why?  Two reasons, I think.  The first is a somewhat crass one:  The holiness of God allows us to rail against no-one.  We cannot use the word of God as a weapon of God to bring the change we think needs to be in the world, because in that sense holiness has very little to do with this world or our agendas.

The second reason is that the Holiness of God imparts guilt and requires action. 

By demonstrating and saying that God is holy, we are saying that we are sinners.  And sinning makes us feel bad (as it should, by the way).  But feeling bad is not something that a great many churches want to do these days:  it drives away people and convinces them that Christianity is "as seen on TV".  Better to engage them with words and feelings and movements of the society around them. 

And it requires action. It requires us to repent of our sin - even more, it requires us to agree with God on the issues as He sees them and change our view to match His, something which is not popular is a society that sees so much of the Bible as anachronistic and a tool of oppressive morality and domination.

The catch?  Without holiness, no-one can see the Lord.  Ultimately our ability to see God is predicated upon us accepting the sacrifice of Christ on our behalf for our sin - our unholiness, as it were.  And without acknowledging that sin, that unholiness, we cannot be saved from it.

Be careful, Church of the West.  Do not exchange your calling to be a holy people of a holy God to be a socially relevant people of a socially relevant God.  If we do not right this ship, we will end up becoming a chapter in someone else's book of Christian History, while the church that practices holiness somewhere else takes up the torch and moves forward.

4 comments:

  1. I don't see God as human based, with opinions and dictates which are of the human kind, but rather as a greater energy which is without judgement about whatever any one of us human beings gets up to, whether it be good or not so good. This energy is like the best of parents, non critical, showing unconditional love, guiding and supporting us as we travel along the pathway of our lives. It is an energy which is beyond our understanding, so I do not try to put limits on this energy by humanizing it, instead I just accept that it is as it is, and love it all the more for being so.

    However, people seem to be afraid of this energy, and try to rationalize it by cloaking it around in human words and rituals. I see this fear when I am totally open about my experiences with this energy. I have had to stand firm when speaking in the public arena, and eventually stood back from public work because of having to justify my experiences so much.

    As for Christ / Jesus.....I have always seen him as someone who was seriously challenged by his life's pathway, with his faith in there being a higher power being called into question several times, even when he was about to pass over. And his resurrection was given to us an example that there is life after 'death'. I do not think for one moment that he died for our sins. I think that his life is an example of how we can overcome our difficulties, and that it is alright to occasionally lose our way, because we will get back on track again eventually.

    I seem to have gone on a bit, TB, you seemed to have sparked me off!

    Vx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Somebody wiser than I said that the church is not the faith.

    Holiness is a tough sell in a zero trust society where the name of the game is to do unto others before they do unto you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Vera, It is all good. The point (or at least one of the points of these sorts things) is to spark discussion, not destroy it.

    I always try to approach people's understanding of spirituality careful, as they have backgrounds and experiences that I have not - for example, you have experienced things that I never have and as a result, you have an experience of some things that I do not.

    My complaint is not so much with those outside the church but those within it. Defining something to meet current societal needs means you are building on foundation that will collapse within a generation or two. That is not what God really intended.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Glen - or in a society where the world essentially revolves around my needs and satisfying myself.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are welcome (and necessary, for good conversation). If you could take the time to be kind and not practice profanity, it would be appreciated. Thanks for posting!