Given my general bent, I spend more than my fair share of time thinking about, well you know, various things, like the weather and how my rabbit is doing and if the Etruscans had conquered Italia instead of the Romans would we be speaking Church Eruscan and, of course, the general fall of the republic and the economy (it is rather crowded in here and there is rather a lot going on). For the latter, I also spend a fair amount of time thinking about various scenarios wherein the powers that be, who do not quite care for my kind of people (age, belief system, culture) do things to curtail freedom without "curtailing" it - something not as blatant as "banning from the InterWeb" (although always a possibility) but other, softer ways to make obedience appear reasonable and "disobedience" as foolish and painful.
Last night it came to me: Footwear.
(No, I have not completely lost my mind from overthinking. Well, probably not.)
We take footwear for granted. I would argue that I have minimal footwear management, and I own four pairs of boots, two pair of sneakers, and a pair of zori (sandals) for Iai. The Ravishing Mrs. TB owns, well, considerably more.
We use footwear everywhere. We do not think about the weather or environment, at least for our feet, unless we misjudge either badly (wearing tennis shoes in the rain, for example - wet feet, but not frozen-toes-falling-off feet). If shoes wear out, we simply buy a new pair. No muss, no fuss.
But what would happen if footwear became a controlled commodity? What if it was controlled for sale the way any other controlled substances or items are? What if that control was based on how the government viewed you?
Practically speaking, what easier way to control a population?
Try running is a pair of flip-flops. Trying going a single day without shoes just around the outside of your house. Once upon a time, most of us went long periods of time without shoes in summer -but we were young and there was a great deal of grass and earth to run on, not the concrete and blacktop that most of us live in now.
Beyond the simple social issue of "no shoes, no service", shoes allow us to go out and do a great many things. Take away shoes - or take away the ability to use any shoes which allow any actual useful movement - and you cripple someone. I can rather easily imagine a world where (with the advent of the magical "electronic" currency) the purchase of anything beyond basic footwear is controlled. Have an unwelcome opinion? Follow the wrong belief system? A bare minimum for you. The better footwear - the desirable, useful, "cool" footwear - goes to those who have decided to toe the dominant power line.
Some people would adjust, of course - the good news is that your feet will toughen up at any age and if you look hard enough, you can find out ways to make the Roman solider sandals called caligae (you can laugh, but they managed to conquer a great deal of the European world in them) or the straw sandals of Japan called waraji (which are woven grass). But without footwear, a great many things become very difficult.
Sometimes we always look for the big control points. The reality is that the smallest and slightest thing in our modern world can make an oversize difference - because we have largely become dependent on others to do and make almost everything for us.
You need to keep it down on the ESP frequency,TB. All that noise woke me up early and I pooped the bed and wrote a scholarly post of my own on footwear!
ReplyDeleteThey say great minds think alike and if so - you definitely get the worst of that one. 😉
Oh, they will control more than footwear. Gloves. Coats. Not being facetious, you got me thinking.
ReplyDeleteThey are already trying to make it illegal to own a vehicle that runs on liquid fuel. Never mind how many people that would put out of work; how far can you really travel in an electric vehicle? At 60 below?
How many travel trailers are pulled by all electric vehicles?
How many trees can you pull?
How many acres can you plow?
Can you get almost 2000 miles with no charge?
If it weren't for fire ants, I'd be barefoot all summer.
Just need my tetanus booster in 3 years. A lot of sloppy construction work that will probably never be finished cleaning up.
You missed the big jumping-off point, TB; before "they" controlled what shoes you could buy, they'd be controlling your MONEY! That, my friend, is well on its way to happening...
ReplyDeleteKeep some cash, silver, and if possible, gold handy. If you feel something will be in short supply or "controlled," keep spares handy. As they say, "Panic now and avoid the rush!"
I read somewhere that when the north Vietnamese captured American soldiers they took their boots away. An easy way to ensure that the POWs couldn't run away...
ReplyDeleteDiane
Glen, we have to stop psychically meeting like this...
ReplyDeleteLinda, the control of transportation is definitely a large concern. Easy enough to ensure people stay "in close" and "put" by making sure that they can only go so far.
ReplyDeleteInteresting. I may the generation that started with Men on the Moon and ended with everyone going a day's travel or less.
I forgot the push for the autonomous vehicle, too, courtesy of "I Robot".
DeleteSucker us in with safety and then they are taking us where they want us.
Pete, on the one hand I would say that control of the money supply is almost axiomatic at point (we keep nudging ourselves that way now). But control of money is too big and bold, raises too many hackles. Shoes now, who cares about shoes?
ReplyDeleteDiane - Interesting and I guess not surprising at all. My theory in action.
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by!
The autonomous car is actually one of the threats to general liberty that most concerns me. Once the technology is perfected, look for the quick and speedy end to the private automobile - and with that, the ability to go where you want, when you want.
ReplyDelete