Patrice Lewis over at Rural Revolution wrote a rather thought provoking article last week entitled "The dying art of writing". In the article, she reflects on the fact that with the rise of AI, the human art of writing is at a series of interesting points.
The first point is simply that AI cannot always determine what is human generated and what is AI generated and thus may label human generated comment as AI. The second point is that - from an article entitled "The Rise Of AI Writing, and The Decline Of the Human Voice" - that language is becoming both increasingly the same in writing (as AI standardizes a voice) and at the same time, less impactful: "polished, formulaic speech", as the article states.
The final point is that as AI continues to be brought into the common societal stream, it simply will become more common, if for convenience and cost if nothing else. At the same time, Lewis laments the fact that as her (and my) generation passes, the coming generations will simply not have the ability to differentiate AI generated writing from human generated writing.
At the end of the article she notes "I don't know how long I will be able to cling to a career as a writer, but I will enjoy it while I can."
----
It is a fair statement to say that writing is at a crossroads.
If you are someone that writes or keeps an online presence, likely you have noticed a decrease in the overall "real" traffic to the site - I say real because while I, for example, have tens of thousands of "views" a day (per Google), my individual posts are much, much less than that. It is not just my imagine: content creators of all varieties have noted that with a change in search engines (Google the primary one), traffic is simply much less because is both much more selective and uses AI to create summaries: no need to click through if the summary at the top tells you everything.
For folks that make a living from a site, that can be a hard thing: the rise of SubStack, for example, is one method for creating written content that will somehow fund itself. Even that is a bit of chancy business I suppose, dependent on the ability of the writer and the audience - although many content creators are directly marketing through social media rather than the traditional "Search Engine" route.
But there are tens of people including myself that keep a blog or site simply because we enjoy writing and indirectly enjoy interacting with people who read our writing. They are written in the old, painful sense, keystroke by keystroke (if not starting in pen and then transferring to the keyboard).
AI changes all that of course: within seconds or minutes it can generate text or a story which may or may not be good - but as Lewis notes above, people may not care about the quality of it as a work of communication or human lived experience. They care if it has the information or content or entertainment they want.
If blogs or sites create communities strung out like towns a day's travel apart in the Old West, the change in the InterWeb and AI are the equivalent of the railroad coming to town. Some are picked, by chance or choice, and continue on. Others are not chosen and, more often than not, may fade away.
---
Where does this all lead?
Some weeks ago, I read an article (I cannot remember where it was) from a blog author who decided he was given up. He may have been one who wrote and made something of a living at it (as I recall), but now the effort was simply not worth it to him. He had considered a "pay as you go" experience like SubStack, but also decided that was not worth it. He was punching out.
Generally speaking, that likely reflects a strong current of what will eventually happen. It is hard to blame anyone really: for myself, a blog post can take anywhere between 30 and 60 minutes to write and edit. Over the course of a week, that can be up to seven hours (or more). To pump those out regularly only to see your numbers continue to drift downward can be depressing. Add to that I suspect the blog and website crowd is likely in the 40's or more, and the medium will likely decline more based on demographics as well.
On the one hand, that saddens me. As I noted above, blogs (and sites) can become their own sort of community and the loss of every one means one more voice gone.
On the other hand, it is likely not as bad as I might think.
Even within our own modern world, there is a segment of the population that prefers things that are handcrafted or handmade above the commercially generated. And in a sense, AI could eventually make itself irrelevant in the sense that if all AI sounds the same, it will become bland and boring.
That is where the artisanal blog comes in: It is different. It is personal. It is unique in that every writer has their own unique voice.
Will there be money to be made? Probably not, although a few hardy souls will figure out a way. But it will be genuine and honest and real in a way that AI could never be.
Besides, the phrase "This post was hand crafted by a human artisanal writer" has a certain ring to it.




















