Friday, April 11, 2025

Essentialist (XIV): Essence of the Essentialist: Explore: Play

 Anyone of a certain age will remember the ending of the Disney movie "Mary Poppins" where the father of the household, George Banks - a rather gruff figure who is the paragon of a British Banker in the early t20th Century - has been disgraced and his career cashiered, suddenly realizes the joy that he has missed for so many years.  At the end of the movie find him, bowler hat with a hole in it, flying a kite joyfully with his children (cue "Let's Go Fly a Kite" here), having restored joy not just to himself, but to his household.

A fictional story, writes McKeown, but based in an idea that play can restore a great many things - joy, camaraderie, delight - to our lives.

One never has to teach a child to play; they seem to figure it out on their own.  Their imaginations take over, spinning tales and activities in their mind.  It becomes as spontaneous and free form - and it is not just us as humans:  young animals love to play as well.  Go to any shelter or barnyard or zoo and one will find young animals - and older ones - engaging in activities that make no sense except that they are...well, playful.

But something happens to us humans over time as we grow up: "We are introduced to the idea that play is trivial, that it is a waste of time.  Play is unnecessary.  Play is childish.  Unfortunately, many of these negative messages come from the very place where imaginative play should most encouraged."  Schools, posits McKeown, are a large contributor.  Based on the work of Sir Ken Robinson, a researcher of creativity, he notes "We have sold ourselves into a fast-food model of education and it's impoverishing our spirit and our energies as much as fast food is depleting our physical bodies...Imagination is the source of every form of human achievement.  And it's the one thing I believe we are systematically jeopardizing in the way we educate our children and ourselves."

Nor, McKeown notes, is the workplace any better: companies tend not only to not foster the concept of play and creativity, but actively undermine it.  Not surprising, he suggests, based on the fact that modern corporations are a product of the Industrial Revolution which focused on efficiency in the mass production of goods and used the military of its day as a model for organizational purposes.

"Play", as McKeown defines it, is "...anything we do simply for the joy of doing it rather as a means to an end." Play matters, he suggests, as studies show adults who engage in some form of play see results in anything ranging from "personal health to relationships to education to organization's ability to innovate."  Play, he states is critical to firing up the brain.

So how do Essentialists handle this?  How does play provide inputs to the pursuit of the vital few in the midst of the trivial many?  In three ways, suggests McKeown.

1)  The first way is that it broadens the range of options to us.  By playing - doing something for the sheer joy of doing it - many things can happen.  We see possibilities we might not have otherwise seen, we broaden our perspectives, we make connections, we learn new things.  Albert Einstein valued play:  "When I examine myself and my methods of thought, I come to the conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me than my talent for absorbing knowledge."

2)  The second way is that play acts as a antidote to stress.  One way is fairly obvious: we move our mind to something we enjoy.  The second is that the more stressed we become, the more the creative and innovative functions of our brain shut down and our thinking narrows (apparently during stress, the emotional part of the brain, the amygdala, gets stimulated while the cognitive part of the brain, the hippocampus, is suppressed).

3)  The third way is that play has a positive effect on the executive functions of the brain - planning, prioritizing, scheduling, anticipating, delegating, and analyzing.  Play stimulated both the careful logical reasoning side and the carefree exploration sides of the brain.  As result, quoting psychiatrist Edward M. Hallowell, key breakthroughs in thinking come through in times of play: 

"Columbus was at play when it dawned on him the world was round.  Newton was at play in his mind when he saw the apple tree and suddenly conceived of the force of gravity.  Watson and Crick were playing with possible shapes of the DNA molecule when they stumbled upon the double helix.  Shakespeare played with iambic pentameter his whole life.  Mozart barely lived a waking moment when he was not at play.  Einstein's thought experiments are brilliant examples of the mind invited to play."

How does the Essentialist do this? Mostly it is on their own initiative:  companies (on the whole) do not encourage play or the concept of play as important; if anything, they tend to emphasize The Non-essentialist's view that play is trivial.  Which is a bit odd in that companies often deeply desire the creativity and innovation that moves the world (and profit) forward.

How do we start this process for ourselves?  McKeown suggests we start in our own past to mine our own memories:  What did you do as a child that excited you?  How can you re-create that?

---

Application

I have to admit that of the four items to explore, this one was the most counterintuitive and odd to me.

Do I agree with his premises, that play is valuable and that it is pushed away by institutions and well-meaning people as we grow up?  I do.  My mind goes back to the quote I posted earlier this week  "One day, you and your friends went out to play for the last time".   It happens, almost imperceptibly at first, until we find ourselves mired in a job and a home and a life that seems too often to do everything it can to remove those opportunities. "Play" becomes something we do for two hours on the weekends or thirty minutes on a evening and often has ulterior motives: the workout that is only ever in a gym, the sport that masquerades as a social event, the reading that only takes place because it is required.

Do schools also insure this?  It is obviously long since I have been in school so I do not know if I can fully address that.  But business?  Business is the play killer:  Serious stuff we are about here, no fun allowed.  This can be as wide ranging as the modern open business office where no-one has space and thus no ability to display personality or fun to the groups and meetings which are only, ever slow descents into the madness of the endless discussion.

In other words, if we are going to be about play and the benefits it offers, it is up to the individual.  No-one and no institution will encourage this for you.

Oddly enough, I think this is one place that I may actually be doing okay.

I tend to be whimsical at work.  I hum to myself as I walk along.  I happily present bad Dad jokes.  My rule of thumb is "If your phone ringer is on and loud, I will dance.  Even in a meeting."  I have known to skip in the hall.

I try activities at home that are mostly useless in the modern world, or at least not at all profitable but bring joy to me.  I collect random historical facts about specific times and periodically present them for no good reason.  I continue to try to make "International Speak Like A Pirate Day" an actual thing at work.

I undoubtedly cause my managers some grief (although not of the Human Resources kind).  I am reasonable sure there are those that consider me a somewhat unserious person.  But I have to admit that I am usually pretty happy and can bring a smile to almost anyone I meet.

I may not be able to play as much as I used to, but I try to gamify the corporate work experience and life outside of work.  Am I more creative?  Hard to say.  But I do tend to be on the happy side more often than not.


6 comments:

  1. Your essentialist series has been highly interesting, and I have to say this post is especially so. I'm guessing it's one everyone will relate to. I recall as a child telling myself that when I grew up I would never stop playing. Then, life sort of beats it out of you. Even as a retired adult I have a hard time giving myself permission to do things purely for pleasure. Somehow, society's idea that things only have value if they make money is difficult to shake off.

    In the mid-90s I was homeschooling my kids, but knew people who had to deal with an educational concept (experiment?) in the pubic school system where the idea was that kids would simply "catch on" to reading and writing. Several parents complained to me that the school wasn't teaching how to read, or even things like basic grammar so as not to stifle creativity. Not sure what became of that theory, but I did note that standardized academic test scores dropped across the nation in subsequent years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Leigh, I am glad you are enjoying it. It has been a very good exercise for myself as well. Like you, I can think of times where I swore I would never end up stuck in an office building just working at a desk, but here we are. And like you, I find it very hard now to justify "playtime" except under the guise of hobbies or somehow useful activities.

      It is of note that we seem to spend more and more per pupil per year and at least overall scores and abilities seem to drop. Saying that of course, I undermine the point above that says that the current educational system kills creativity. That said, there is a balance between that creativity and basic skills that allow one to function as an adult in a modern society, knowledge and skills that need to be have. We have already largely banished the art and practice of writing by hand; given voice technology I can see a day where we banish the art and practice of reading because everything is verbalized and so much is automatically done. It is a bit of a grim future.

      Delete
  2. Nylon128:02 AM

    My guess is that if you ask most adults how do they like to play, their facial expression will arch their eyebrows up to their hairline. So what if some consider you an unserious person, keep skipping in the hall TB......:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nylon12, I would be the same - or they would not define it as "play", they would define it at "this thing that I do". Which is better than nothing, I suppose: odd that such an innocuous word like "play" becomes so difficult to use.

      Delete
  3. I think for our generation, school and work definitely damped our playful spirits we had as kids. But I would argue that the newer generations had it damped by their parents, or lack of parenting. So many of my kids peers seem unable to play at all without sitting in front of an electronic device. If left in a room full of toys, they are unable to muster up imagination to use them. I think all this will translate into even more repercussions from lack of play as their generations grow older.

    To tie this in to your comment to Leigh, one of the repercussions is that schools now spend lots of class time teaching children things that our parents taught us but modern parents don't evidently teach their kids. Hence why I feel test scores keep going down despite the increases in funding. At some point I hope we realize that our government can't do everything and that we must shoulder some of the burdens of creating a better society ourselves.

    I still try to stimulate my creative imaginative side from time to time but not nearly as often as I probably should. It has changed though and instead of playing with toys in the dirt under the tree out front, it is writing or building things out of wood these days.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ed - What a fascinating thought. After considering it, I think I quite agree with you - and from the little I have read, so do the economics of toy companies: toy sales are heading downward.

      We were pretty controlled about how much screen time Na Clann got back in the day. I compare that in some ways to what I see out in the wild, where toddlers get their parents' phones at restaurants or waiting at an airport. It is easy - I can see that it is very easy to just put a screen in front of a child and carry on.

      One of the laments my sister (who is a teacher) makes is the overall lack of parental engagement. She teaches at a lower income/largely immigrant school and the parents either cannot engage or it is simply not part of their heritage and practice. I compare that against other parents - the proverbial "Tiger Mom" - who are completely consumed with making sure their child succeeds to the best of their ability (maybe sometimes in unhealthy ways). And there is always the question - at least as long as Na Clann were in school - about the way time is being spent in school and on what subjects. It is a complicated problem with no easy solution (no matter, I suspect, what people say).

      If I struggle with engaging my creative side, it is because I have to "convince" myself that do such things is not a "waste of time".

      Delete

Comments are welcome (and necessary, for good conversation). If you could take the time to be kind and not practice profanity, it would be appreciated. Thanks for posting!