Saturday, April 03, 2021

Transfer Of Power

 Those of us alive today are uniquely in the position of seeing not one, but two world paradigm power shifts.  Most people never see any.

When I speak of a world paradigm shift, I am talking about the balance of power shifting away from one state and to another (or more than one).  The Rise of The Athenian Empire - and its fall to Sparta, who fell in turn. The rise of the Persian Empire, followed by its fall to the Macedonian Empire.  The Rise (and Fall) of Rome and the West.  The rise of the Aztec Empire - and its fall, in turn.

In other words, not just a change in international politics, exchanging one player for another.  A change in how the national or international system works.

The first, in my lifetime, was the fall of The Soviet Union in 1989 and the collapse of Eastern Europe and the Warsaw Pact,  From 1947, this was the paradigm of the modern world.  Countries were either pro-Western or pro-Eastern (yes, there was a Non-aligned movement, but it never achieved the power of the other two).  When the Soviet Union fell - characterized, more than anything else, by the falling of the Berlin Wall - the world worked differently.  There was a unipolar world and the United States and its allies were in charge.

We are now seeing a second paradigm shift.  The fall of the United States in terms of world power and the rise of other nations.

Think of it, if you are a nation doing national power calculus.  The U.S. still has the ability to project power - it is an old boxer, who still has the power if he connects - but it is literally tearing itself apart politically, culturally, and socially.  If you are a potential ally, to ally yourself with the U.S. is to accept all of its cultural values and norms as correct and yours as invalid.  Additionally, the U.S. is currently in a race to see precisely how much additional debt it can take on in the smallest amount of time possible ($1.9 Trillion in the most recent relief package, another $2.25 trillion at a minimum in the new infrastructure bill, with at least one more proposed bill outstanding.  Their solution is to raise the tax rate on corporations to a level higher than one of their opponents, China - and assure their citizens that the cost "will not be passed on".

In other words, a dis-united country rapidly approaching financial distress.  If you are thinking this has a similarity to The Soviet Union in the 1980's, you would not be wrong.

If I am one of the United States' current opponents - Russia, China, Iran - I really do not have to do much, if anything.  I just have to sit back and keep a certain level of confrontation up - maybe not war, just stress, the kind of stress that wears.  And wait.  The baton of power is already slipping from their hand; it will just slip more all the more quickly.

My prediction?   In future history books,  the period of dominance of the United States will be recognized as 1945-2020.  

To those who think that this will only be a slight inconvenience or even a slight gain due to a lessening of "spending", think again.  The fate of second rate powers in a winner take all Realpolitik system is not the sort of thing to write home about.

11 comments:

  1. Well it's complicated, TB.

    From what I've heard, if America tanks - so does China. It's game over for us up here in Canada too. Like yourselves, our nations are built on a financial house of cards.

    And if China goes, North Korea, and some of their vassal states go too...

    I am not convinced the End Of Times will result. The former USSR collapsed financially and they had rough times, but it wasn't the end of the world for them either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glen, I agree it is likely not the End of Times that results (from this). But I do think that we are seeing the flow of power away from the West (sadly, what impacts Baja Canada impacts Alta Canada). And although China is economically tied to us in many ways, they are also (at their heart) an autocracy. Ultimately, they do not care about short term suffering in the face of strategic gains.

      Delete
  2. The "media" tells us that the borders and orders of the present are sacrosanct, unless... It profits them to tell you that change is good. There will be rules and rulers, they will just not be the present rules and rulers. We are most obviously going through a transition behind the scenes. What the new rules are may not be clear yet, but they will be enforced.

    Prepare...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just So, as (I think) I wrote last month, borders and states have historically been fluid. It is only in the late 19th and 20th century that we have become convinced they "will always be the way they are". That is not the historical record.

      There is a transition going on. You make a wonderful point that the rules - whenever they appear - will be enforced. Even if it is to the disadvantage of those previously in power.

      Delete
  3. I'm more or less with Glen above, if the USA collapses economically, so does China. They are built on a house of cards as well. Which is why they are not waging a hot war against us, it's a war of infiltration and globalization to make us a vassal state in the endgame.
    I've no idea how it ends up, but I have learned from history that when economies collapse, government does not disappear. It becomes very, very nasty. All I can do as an individual is to try to be the grey man and be invisible to tyranny as best as I can.
    I am entirely convinced that the powers behind the scenes driving this trainwreck really do not understand or foresee the consequences they will bring about. They will lose as much as everyone else as their dreams of neo-feudalism crash and burn too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Greg, agreed that almost anyone who thinks they are driving this change has an actual clue how things will actually work out. History is not kind to those who are empire or world builders - they may succeed for a space, but never for a long period of time.

      More and more, my number one rule is becoming "Do not call attention to yourself". In anything.

      Delete
  4. And because I have nothing to add, I say a Blessed Easter to you all.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kind of late to the party due to my avoidance and electronics on weekends, but I'm not worry about a loss of dominance for the U.S. right now though it could very well happen at some point in the future. Besides the house of cards theory above, many of our competitors have big social issues going on within their countries as well. Until they get those sorted out, I don't think I've seen someone who could take our reins even if they wanted too.

    Our debt is certainly an issue though and I'm not sure how it will effect us or when. I'm a bit leery of all the spending that has been going on in the last two years in the name of Covid. This latest infrastructure bill, while I'm excited to see us finally investing into our infrastructure, I'm normally not to keen on the tax implications. While they are calling for raising taxes on corporations, so many of them don't pay any taxes anyway due to other tax laws in effect so it will become a burden on those small businesses which have the shallowest pockets to begin with. But I'm blathering away with no real solutions. I just hope that a solution becomes apparent before it is too late.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ed, there is never a time limit on commenting here! Even if it years later (although for current events, that might be a bit of an issue).

      I, too, am a fan of infrastructure. But paid for infrastructure. And for all the assurances that "this time", businesses will pay, we all know they will not (to be honest, they could "pay" anytime they wanted to. They just choose not too. Which says something about their commitment to such things).

      The most likely solution is nothing will be done: taxes will be raised on the businesses least able to support it, the value of the dollar will continue to drop, and everywhere people will lament the loss of local small business. And do nothing to actual solve the problem.

      Delete
  6. The power shift of 1989 was a hiccup in many ways. It is the same as it was these days in Russia...could even be more reunified soon!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It certainly seems that the CIS will look like the old Russia in the not too distant future. All that is old is new again.

      Delete

Comments are welcome (and necessary, for good conversation). If you could take the time to be kind and not practice profanity, it would be appreciated. Thanks for posting!