May
01, 20XX
My
Dear Lucilius:
As I
was reading over your response, I suddenly realized that I had never
really told you about how I physically ended up here. The story is
still painful even though the events are several years in the past –
but at your unspoken question, I will relate it.
You
will remember when my wife died (of course you do – you came out
for the funeral). We had spoken for some years about what we were
going to do when we finally retired but, like many, found our joint
plans suddenly rent asunder. I found myself a widower nearing my
earliest retirement possibilities with no-one at home – the
children were all gone at that point and the house was rather empty,
filled on the those occasions when we had visitors from out of town.
It
was after that event, when I was still processing my wife's death and
adjusting to life as a single man after almost 30 years of not being
so, that I received a letter from the City of _____ Housing
Allocation Department, informing me that as I single person
inhabiting a house of over 1200 square feet I was in violation of
the City's Fair Housing ordinances. Within 60 days I had three
options: I could sell the home, I could take in more people as
renters or “home sharers”, or be subject to an additional tax.
There
was an address on the letter of course, so the next day I took the
trip downtown to visit them (Mr. Seneca Goes Downtown, as it were).
My impression of trips to the city core were always the same: they
took too long to see too much traffic and too many people in places
that were too expensive. I remained convinced of all of this on this
trip as well.
After
posing my question at the desk, I was shown off to a waiting room
with four or five other individuals – the sort rooms that all
government agencies seem to design to make the process as
uncomfortable as possible: the room is slightly too hot or too cold
to be comfortable, the chairs are slightly too small and stick just a
bit to you, and the room is completely silence, thus making any sort
of speech or conversation highly uncomfortable.
I
was finally called into to maze of cubicles to a desk inhabited by
what I have come to know as a typical civil servant (of which, you
have commented, there are two types: the young true believers who
have not been there long enough and the weathered and wizened time
server, who has been there too long). In my case I had the former, a
young man of indeterminate age and interest. He pulled up my file on
his screen, reviewed it for a minute, and then handed the letter
back.
“The
law is rather clear, Mr….X” he responded. One person in a house
of 1200 square feet is considered wasteful and not a good use of
resources. You have 60 days to fix the matter.”
“But
my wife just passed away...” I started.
He
shook his head. “There are no exceptions. You – alone in that
house – are a wasting valuable city resources and mis-aligning the
affordability index in our city. You have three choices – take in
renters of course, which is moderately useful but frankly rather
selfish as you keep the money. You can also be reassessed and pay
the additional tax – although frankly, no-one does that more than a
year. Or” he suddenly perked up his smile, the sort of thing that
reminded me of Death trying to crack a joke, “you can engage in our
Home Sharer program”.
“Home
Sharer?” I asked slowly.
“Oh
yes” he bubbled over, suddenly engaged. “The Home Sharer program
is where the City matches people that have homes with people that
need other people in their homes. The great part of the program is
that you help people find affordable housing and the people have a
place to live.”
“But
what about rent?” I asked.
“There
is no “rent”” he said in finger quotes. “The home sharers
pay what they are able. The home owner realizes a net benefit from
not being charged an additional tax. It is a fantastic way to help
align our city's population and home shortage and really make sure
that everyone has the opportunity to live somewhere nice. Can I sign
you up? I can have someone move in by the end of the week.”
I
muttered something about being out of town and I would consider it.
He insisted that I take a form with me as I went.
The
tax, you can imagine, was rather odious. It was intended to be. I
spent the evening in my chair in the living room, listening to the
memories echo throughout my mind and thinking of all the events that
had happened there – good events, enjoyable events.
And
then I called my real estate agent.
Kindhearted
as she was (indeed, she was the one that brought us into this home),
she had to have a frank conversation with me. “You'll get three
kinds of bids” she told me over the phone. At the quizzical tone
from my breathing, she continued. “The first will be from someone
who buys homes to rent them. It will be slightly lower than asking
price. The second will be from someone who wants to buy the home to
live in it – although where you are now located, those are becoming
rarer and rarer because of price. The third is from the Housing
Allocation Department. It will be very low – and most often, the
one taken.”
I
sputtered a bit. “The lowest but the most often taken? How is
this so?
“The
City's will discount the house price to what you paid for the house
when you bought it – slightly adjusted for inflation but not a
great deal. Yes, I know that you have paid a lot more in property
taxes due to value adjustments – I hear that all the time. The
City considers those to be the price of having a house and that you
as a homeowner should not unduly profit in a location where housing
is so scarce. They state that they are saving the sellers money by
lowering their overall tax burden.”
I
sat and thought on the phone, of the family Christmases and tears and
dinners and date pickups that had happened here, and then the young
man downtown who was almost gleeful at the thought of putting
strangers into my home with no guarantee of contributing to the
payment or upkeep.
“Put
the house out. A family if you can find one, a rental property if
not. But no City. I will pay the tax for a year if I have to.”
She
really was quite the professional. She found a young family who
wanted a house with four bedrooms and a backyard for their future. I
was so enchanted with them – they reminded me of my family, once
upon a time – that I dropped the price somewhere so they could move
in – and, frankly, to spite the City. And so I found myself with a
60 day rent back (the most, oddly enough, allowed here) to completely
redesign my life.
I
will leave you at this juncture, Lucilius, as I am sure you are
curious about how I got from there to here – and managed to shed my
career in the process. I shall have to ask for your patience.
With
greatest regards,
Seneca
My trigger finger is getting itchy... :)
ReplyDeleteGlen, to show you how close to life this actually is, our local City Council is now demanding that developers put in more duplexes and triplexes because single family homes are, and I quote, "Exclusionary" - e.g., they are not "creating" enough opportunities for people to live in "affordable" circumstances. Life imitating art indeed.
ReplyDelete